On Sep 20, 2013, at 7:05 AM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Extend gengtype (and gtype.state reading/writing) so that it is able to
> parse base classes in simple cases, and only attempt to do it for
> GTY-marked types.

I endorse this, and look forward to using it in the wide-int branch.  I expect 
it should remove my lower quality handling of bases in that branch (my derived 
classes had no data, and I only had to support types with no pointers, no 
complexity, just integral types).  Looks nice, simple and clean.

Reply via email to