On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah I see.  I definitely agree it's good to accept that instead of
> being unnecessarily strict, but other people will want the option of
> strict conformance, so I think we can please everyone with something
> like:
>
> else
>   {
> #ifdef __STRICT_ANSI__
>     __throw_regex_error(regex_constants::error_escape);
> #else
>    _M_token = _S_token_ord_char;
>    _M_value.assign(1, __c);
> #endif
>   }

Sorry for late >.<

Do I need to bootstrap again?


-- 
Tim Shen

Attachment: a.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to