This patch fixes PR58369, an ICE in subreg_get_info when compiling
boost for m68k-linux.

choose_reload_regs attempts to reload a DFmode (8-byte) reg, finds
an XFmode (12-byte) reg in "last_reg", and calls subreg_regno_offset
with these two modes and a subreg offset of zero.  However, this is
not a correct lowpart subreg offset for big-endian and these two modes,
so the lowpart subreg check in subreg_get_info fails, and the code
continues to

    gcc_assert ((GET_MODE_SIZE (xmode) % GET_MODE_SIZE (ymode)) == 0);

which fails because (12 % 8) != 0.

choose_reload_regs passes the constant zero, in all cases where the reg
isn't already a subreg, as the subreg offset to subreg_regno_offset, even
though lowpart subregs on big-endian targets require an explicit offset
computation.  I think that is a bug.

I believe other big-endian targets don't see this ICE because
a) they define CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS to reject differently-sized
   modes in floating-point registers (which prevents this path in
   choose_reload_regs), or
b) their differently-sized modes are such that the size of a larger
   mode is a whole multiple of the size of the smaller mode (which
   allows the gcc_assert above to pass).

This patch changes choose_reload_regs to call subreg_lowpart_offset
to pass an endian-correct offset to subreg_regno_offset, except where
the offset comes from a pre-existing subreg.

[Defining CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS appropriately for m68k also fixes
the ICE, but I don't think the m68k backend really wants that, and I
think it just papers over a generic bug.]

Tested with trunk and 4.8 on {m68k,sparc64,powerpc64}-linux (big-endian),
and on x86_64-linux/armv5tel-linux-gnueabi (little-endian).  No regressions.

Comments?
Is this Ok for trunk?

gcc/

2013-09-28  Mikael Pettersson  <mikpeli...@gmail.com>

        PR rtl-optimization/58369
        * reload1.c (choose_reload_regs): Use subreg_lowpart_offset
        to pass endian-correct lowpart offset to subreg_regno_offset.

--- gcc-4.9-20130922/gcc/reload1.c.~1~  2013-09-09 15:07:10.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-4.9-20130922/gcc/reload1.c      2013-09-28 16:24:21.068294912 +0200
@@ -6497,6 +6497,7 @@ choose_reload_regs (struct insn_chain *c
          if (inheritance)
            {
              int byte = 0;
+             bool byte_is_fixed = false;
              int regno = -1;
              enum machine_mode mode = VOIDmode;
 
@@ -6519,7 +6520,10 @@ choose_reload_regs (struct insn_chain *c
                  if (regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
                    regno = subreg_regno (rld[r].in_reg);
                  else
-                   byte = SUBREG_BYTE (rld[r].in_reg);
+                   {
+                     byte = SUBREG_BYTE (rld[r].in_reg);
+                     byte_is_fixed = true;
+                   }
                  mode = GET_MODE (rld[r].in_reg);
                }
 #ifdef AUTO_INC_DEC
@@ -6557,6 +6561,8 @@ choose_reload_regs (struct insn_chain *c
                  rtx last_reg = reg_last_reload_reg[regno];
 
                  i = REGNO (last_reg);
+                 if (! byte_is_fixed)
+                   byte = subreg_lowpart_offset (mode, GET_MODE (last_reg));
                  i += subreg_regno_offset (i, GET_MODE (last_reg), byte, mode);
                  last_class = REGNO_REG_CLASS (i);
 

Reply via email to