On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 01/10/13 09:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, that will do. Can you do it for me? I can't do testing easily
>>> on arm myself.
>>
>> It also fails on x86_64 with -m32. I always test on x86_64 with
>> multilibs enabled:
>>
>> make -k -j12 check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/\{,-m32\}"
>
>
> Appears on aarch64-none-elf as well...
> This patch makes the tests pass for me.
>
> I notice there's PR58556 that talks about these failures, so shall I link
> this patch to this PR?
>
> Ok to apply?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Kyrill
>
> P.S. Since we've changed the default cost model for the vectoriser, perhaps
> we should consider reorganising the vectoriser tests taking into
> consideration what tests apply to which cost model?
>
> [gcc/testsuite/]
> 2013-10-01 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/58556
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c: Use dynamic vector cost model.
> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-28.c: Likewise.
