On 10/04/2013 09:20 AM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
>Perhaps you mean that it must match a fully-instantiated function, so any >constraints on the templates were considered during >determine_specialization.
This seems like a simple comment fix, but there's a longer explanation of what I want (see below). Would this be more appropriate? // Do not allow constrained friend template specializations. The intent is stronger than to say it must match something.
By "must" I meant that whatever it matches could only be a fully-instantiated function.
But I guess the main reason for disallowing constraints here is the same as for explicit specializations and non-template functions; non-dependent constraints don't really make any sense.
Jason
