> Well, ok. Please adjust the comment > > + /* Different fields of the same record type cannot overlap, unless > they + are both bitfields and we are at the RTL level. */ > > to sth like > > ??? Bitfields can overlap at RTL level so punt if we end up at > them. > > or sth similar.
Done, thanks. > You don't check whether we are at the RTL level after all (not that this > would be appropriate). Yes, I was sure that you would have criticized that even more ;-) -- Eric Botcazou
