On 1 October 2013 12:40, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 30/09/13 13:40, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>
>>> Well, I thought this patch would work for me, but it does not. It looks
>>> like gcc_no_link is set to 'no' on my target because, technically, I can
>>> link even if I don't use a linker script. I just can't find any
>>> functions.
>>>
>
>> In which case gating on gcc_no_link could be replaced with a test that
>> looks to see if we can link with the library. Perhaps looking for
>> exit() or some such that might reasonably be expected to be present.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> AC_CHECK_FUNC(exit)
>> if test "x${with_newlib}" = "xyes" -a "x${ac_cv_func_exit}" = "xno"; then
>>
>> /Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Patch attached.
>
> /Marcus
>
> 2013-10-01 Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com>
>
> * configure.ac (AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE): Add for exit() then make
> existing AC_CHECK_FUNCS_ONCE dependent on outcome.
Ping^2
/Marcus
