Hi,

On 10/22/2013 03:07 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Is PR17729 still the most significant? (there are related test-suite ones).
For example, PR33911: still no warning for the line "goo<int> f2;" of the original testcase submitted by Benjamin. Funny that apparently current clang has the same issue; icc is fine. There is also PR40075, related to 17729. And more.

Paolo.

Reply via email to