2013/10/24 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>: > On 10/23/13 04:57, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >> >> >> 2013-10-23 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkov...@intel.com> >> >> * mode-classes.def (MODE_POINTER_BOUNDS): New. >> * tree.def (POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE): New. >> * genmodes.c (complete_mode): Support MODE_POINTER_BOUNDS. >> (POINTER_BOUNDS_MODE): New. >> (make_pointer_bounds_mode): New. >> * machmode.h (POINTER_BOUNDS_MODE_P): New. >> * stor-layout.c (int_mode_for_mode): Support MODE_POINTER_BOUNDS. >> (layout_type): Support POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE. >> * tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Support >> POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE. >> * tree.c (build_int_cst_wide): Support POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE. >> (type_contains_placeholder_1): Likewise. >> * tree.h (POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE_P): New. >> * varasm.c (output_constant): Support POINTER_BOUNDS_TYPE. >> * doc/rtl.texi (MODE_POINTER_BOUNDS): New. > > OK for the trunk. IIRC, there was a backend patch with conditional approval > that should be good to go now (conditional upon the acceptance of the > types/modes patch). > > Note that since I asked for a couple things to be renamed that backend patch > might need tweaking. If so, make the obvious changes, post the patch (so > it's recorded into the archives) and go ahead and check it into the trunk. > > jeff >
Thanks! Ilya