On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Vidya Praveen <vidyaprav...@arm.com> wrote: > > Tests gcc.dg/20050922-1.c and gcc.dg/20050922-2.c includes stdlib.h. This > > can > > be a issue especially since they define uint32_t. > > > OK for 4.7, 4.8? > > For release branches, you'd need to transition from the > theoretical to the practical. On which systems (software) > does > it fail? If none, then no, a back port isn't necessary. If > it > fails on a system (or software) on which real users use, then > I'll approve it once you name the system (software) and let it > bake on trunk for a week and see if anyone objects? I too would like to include this change on those branches, as recent generic newlib changes has caused these tests to break (regress) for my autotester for cris-elf testing those branches. brgds, H-P
