On 10/28/2013 06:12 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
ping...
Sorry for the slow response.If we're actually emitting the name now, we need to give it a name different from the complete constructor. I suppose it makes sense to go with C4/D4 as in the decloning patch,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/txt00046.txt (which I've been meaning to revisit before the end of stage 1). Jason
