On Oct 30, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 30 October 2013 22:47, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> Was there a significant purpose for the added C++ comment? If not, can you
>> remove that? If so, can you explain?
>
> grep -A9 "CONTENTS is" gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> # Assume by default that CONTENTS is C code.
> # Otherwise, code should contain:
> # "// C++" for c++,
> # "! Fortran" for Fortran code,
> # "/* ObjC", for ObjC
> # "// ObjC++" for ObjC++
> # and "// Go" for Go
> # If the tool is ObjC/ObjC++ then we overide the extension to .m/.mm to
> # allow for ObjC/ObjC++ specific flags.
> proc check_compile {basename type contents args} {
Ah, but this is why I asked for a significant purpose? The language of the
file selects the options (flags) allowed. The language is set in your code. I
think it was part of trying different ways to fix it, but, it turned out to be
neither necessary or sufficient in the end.
