Hi Peter.
Does this also mean that asan in llvm trunk is broken for Power?
We'll need to fix it there too (or, in fact, first).

--kcc

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 06:47 -0800, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> This patch has not been tested on Mac and we generally do not claim
>> that gcc-asan is supported on Mac.
>> clang-asan *is* supported on Mac and our bots are green (this patch is
>> a merge of the sources which are regularly tested on Mac,
>> but the build procedure is different).
>
> The merge from upstream r191666 seems to have broken my
> powerpc64-linux build.  I'm seeing:
>
> In file included from 
> /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-base/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:21:0:
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:31:2: error: ‘ino_t’ does not name a type
>   ino_t  st_ino;
>   ^
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:33:2: error: ‘nlink_t’ does not name a type
>   nlink_t  st_nlink;
>   ^
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:34:2: error: ‘mode_t’ does not name a type
>   mode_t  st_mode;
>   ^
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:39:2: error: ‘uid_t’ does not name a type
>   uid_t  st_uid;
>   ^
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:40:2: error: ‘gid_t’ does not name a type
>   gid_t  st_gid;
>   ^
> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:42:2: error: ‘off_t’ does not name a type
>   off_t  st_size;
>   ^
> /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-base/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:29:73:
>  error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type 
> ‘__sanitizer::__old_kernel_stat’
>    unsigned struct___old_kernel_stat_sz = sizeof(struct __old_kernel_stat);
>                                                                          ^
> The problem seems to be that the RHEL6 system I am on, the linux/types.h
> kernel header file doesn't define ino_t like it does on newer systems
> which leads to the undefined type errors.  Digging through the other kernel
> header files, I'm not really seeing another header file I can include
> to get it either. :(
>
> Peter
>
>

Reply via email to