Kenneth Zadeck <zad...@naturalbridge.com> writes: > I would leave out the last frag of tree.c. It actually gets rid of what > i consider, a latent bug. it does not show up with the current > implementation of wide-int, but if that implementation changed, it > would. The problem is that you really should not expect that you can > set the min or max value for a type without first setting the precision > of that type.
Ah, OK. I should have realised there was more to it. > Aside from that, this looks fine. Thanks, applied without that hunk. Richard
