On 11/23/2013 08:19 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 23 November 2013 19:19, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and
front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the
entire patch. This patch covers the arc port.
Ok?
wide-int.h says widest_int is always signed, yet the iterations count
in the doloop interface is now unsigned. So, which is right, the code
or the documentation?
I see that dfp.c and vax.c directly include wide-int.h,
but aarch64.c and arc.c don't. Is that safe?
if the compiler produced an error message about not finding something,
we added the include. It is possible that some of these may be
redundant as things have moved around, but safety is not an issue.
Is there a rationale which files directly include wide-int.h and which
ones don't?
