Hi, >>> + else if (ref->type == REF_COMPONENT && >>> ref->u.c.component->attr.function >>> + && ref->u.c.component->attr.proc_pointer >>> + && ref->u.c.component->attr.dimension) > > > I wonder whether one should take care of functions returning BT_CLASS, but I > think one doesn't need to.
yes, I think no special treatment for class results is necessary. They cannot have fixed array bounds anyway. I tried some simple example which were handled properly by the current patch. >>> You cannot assume that the function returns an explicit size array with >>> constant bounds. >> >> A new version is attached, and I have added one of your examples to >> >> the test case. Ok now? > > > OK. Thanks for the patch! Thanks for the review. Committed as r205345. Cheers, Janus
