>> Sorry to pick on you here Steven, but this doesn't meet gcc's >> definition of an obvious patch. Don't believe me?
> No. I don't, let me quote from the policy: I find this whole thread a rather sad and pathetic bikeshed discussion. Regardless of the formal policy, the basic concept is to use common sense. Common sense about the context of the code being changed, common sense about the patch itself, and common sense about the maintenance area and the maintainers. Anything more than that is people trying to create / change rules as a stick to hit each other over the head or a straight jacket to tie each other up. Thanks, David
