On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:48:11PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 11/15/2013 02:23 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > >One small thing that I have not done that Jakub and several other have asked > >me before is that, there are no tests in c-c++-common for _Cilk_for. The > >reason being that the syntax between C and C++ implementations are > >different. In C++, the induction variable must be defined in the initializer > >(e.g. it should start wth _Cilk_for (int ii = 0....)). In C, this is not > >allowed (e.g. it should start as _Cilk_for (ii = 0; ii < 10; ii++)). > > That can be handled with #ifdef __cplusplus.
It isn't allowed even in C99? For OpenMP, int a[30]; void foo () { #pragma omp for for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++) a[i] = i; } is valid for C99. So, perhaps you just want /* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99" { target c } } */ in the c-c++-common tests? Jakub