On 27-11-13 07:20, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/26/13 14:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 26-11-13 11:12, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com>
wrote:
Jason,
This patch prevents creating out-of-bounds BIT_FIELD_REFs in 3
locations.
It fixes a SIGSEGV (triggered by gimple_fold_indirect_ref_1) in
simplify_bitfield_ref. I've added an assert to detect the problematic
BIT_FIELD_REF there.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Looks obvious to me - btw, instead of asserting in tree-ssa-forwprop.c
can you adjust the verify_expr BIT_FIELD_REF code so it checks for
this?
Done.
And I've move the test-case to c-c++-common.
Build and reg-tested on x86_64 (ada inclusive). Now redoing build and
test, but with bootstrap build.
OK for trunk?
Yes, OK for the trunk.
Committed to trunk.
Also ok for 4.8 branch? It's a 4.8/4.9 regression.
Thanks,
- Tom
jeff
