The existing ltu_p fast path can handle any pairs of single-HWI inputs,
even for precision > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT.  In that case both xl and
yl are implicitly sign-extended to the larger precision, but with the
extended values still being compared as unsigned.  The extension doesn't
change the result in that case.

When compiling a recent fold-const.ii, this reduces the number of
ltu_p_large calls from 23849 to 697.

Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.  OK to install?

Thanks,
Richard


Index: gcc/alias.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/alias.c 2013-11-20 12:12:49.393055063 +0000
+++ gcc/alias.c 2013-11-28 12:24:23.307549245 +0000
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ ao_ref_from_mem (ao_ref *ref, const_rtx
          || (DECL_P (ref->base)
              && (DECL_SIZE (ref->base) == NULL_TREE
                  || TREE_CODE (DECL_SIZE (ref->base)) != INTEGER_CST
-                 || wi::ltu_p (DECL_SIZE (ref->base),
+                 || wi::ltu_p (wi::to_offset (DECL_SIZE (ref->base)),
                                ref->offset + ref->size)))))
     return false;
 
Index: gcc/wide-int.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/wide-int.h      2013-11-28 11:44:39.041731636 +0000
+++ gcc/wide-int.h      2013-11-28 12:48:36.200764215 +0000
@@ -1740,13 +1740,15 @@ wi::ltu_p (const T1 &x, const T2 &y)
   unsigned int precision = get_binary_precision (x, y);
   WIDE_INT_REF_FOR (T1) xi (x, precision);
   WIDE_INT_REF_FOR (T2) yi (y, precision);
-  /* Optimize comparisons with constants and with sub-HWI unsigned
-     integers.  */
+  /* Optimize comparisons with constants.  */
   if (STATIC_CONSTANT_P (yi.len == 1 && yi.val[0] >= 0))
     return xi.len == 1 && xi.to_uhwi () < (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) yi.val[0];
   if (STATIC_CONSTANT_P (xi.len == 1 && xi.val[0] >= 0))
     return yi.len != 1 || yi.to_uhwi () > (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) xi.val[0];
-  if (precision <= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+  /* Optimize the case of two HWIs.  The HWIs are implicitly sign-extended
+     for precisions greater than HOST_BITS_WIDE_INT, but sign-extending both
+     values does not change the result.  */
+  if (xi.len + yi.len == 2)
     {
       unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT xl = xi.to_uhwi ();
       unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT yl = yi.to_uhwi ();

Reply via email to