But aren't both OpenMP and Cilk Plus simd clones marked as "omp
declare simd"? In which case you shouldn't have to do anything?
Are the Cilk Plus clones not being marked as "omp declare simd" in
the front-ends?
....Didn't you mention in this thread
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03506.html) that Cilk
Plus SIMD-enabled functions must be marked as "cilk plus elementals"
(as it wsa called then)? Did I misunderstand you?
Both OpenMP and Cilk Plus clones should be marked with "omp declare
simd". But Cilk Plus should _also_ be marked with "cilk plus
elementals" (or "cilk simd function" now). In which case the
aforementioned function doesn't require any changes because Cilk Plus
clones will be seen as they are marked with "omp declare simd".
So...
OpenMP declare simd gets tagged as:
"omp declare simd"
Cilk Plus vector functions gets tagged as:
"omp declare simd"
"cilk simd function"
if (is_simd_fn) { c_token new_token; /* If we are here then it
has be a number. */ new_token.type = CPP_NUMBER;
new_token.keyword = RID_MAX;
I thought we agreed integral constants were allowed. Why would we
be expecting only a number? Also, it should have been "it has TO
be a number".
Whatever that is reading this token only checks if this token is not
a keyword or a variable. So, I put it as a number since it is the
most common case. I clarified it in the comment.
Ah, I see, perfect. Thanks for the comment explaining so.
Aldy
