On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:13:41AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/13/13 12:42, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > >I'm fixing something completely unrelated, and noticed this... > > > >Perhaps I'm missing something, but why do we need a gate when it always > >returns true? Now that we have this `pass_data' business, we can set > >has_gate to false. > > > >I also fixed a minor typo in a comment. > Note that the way we handle pass properties differs when we have a > gate vs no gate. See register_dump_files_1. > > I have no clue why we have that gem and it looks damn strange to me.
afaik that code is useless, I was going to remove it in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg00854.html but I didn't finish fixing the issues with passes with an execute hook and child passes before the end of stage 1 so the unrelated bits didn't get committed yet. Trev > > jeff
