On Wednesday 18 December 2013, Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh wrote: > Ping! > > "Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh" <ganesh.gopalasubraman...@amd.com> wrote: > > Yes, I figured that was the original idea behind it, but the final family > > of the jaguar processors seems to have become 16h instead of 14h > > (bobcat) at some point. > > Yes. It is amdfam16h. I was supposed to pass on some comments on the patch. > 1. Amdfam16h for Jaguar. > 2. For Jaguar, the priority needs to be AVX (AVX got included into the > Jaguar ISA). > Yes, I changed that in the last patch, though I consider it momentarily problematic because you do not yet enable AVX with march=btver2 (AVX versions would currently be better than btver2 versions for a btver2 arch), but expect march=btver2 will be fixed soon.
Regards 'Allan
