On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:43:18PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr54694.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O" } */
> +
> +register void *hfp __asm__("%ebp"); /* { dg-message "note: for" } */
Shouldn't that be %rbp for x86_64? Or do we treat it the same?
> +extern void g(void *);
> +
> +void f(int x) /* { dg-error "frame pointer required"
> } */
> +{
> + g(__builtin_alloca(x));
> +}
Jakub
