On 20 January 2014 21:11, François Dumont <frs.dum...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/20/2014 04:53 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > With this new design couldn't we change the conditions that are used to > decide when to cache the hash code. I haven't study it in detail but it > looks like the default constructible constraint could be removed, no ?
Ah yes, I forgot about that part, I'll update the __cache_default definition. Thanks.
