> It looks like the committed version removed the space after "insn". > Was that intentional? It now triggers on MIPS because of the frame-related > (insn/f) prologue instruction that stores the link register. The posted > version works for me FWIW.
I found out that it didn't fail with the space on x86 (hence false negative) because of the TI marker added by some RTL pass. Feel free to adjust back. -- Eric Botcazou