> It looks like the committed version removed the space after "insn".
> Was that intentional?  It now triggers on MIPS because of the frame-related
> (insn/f) prologue instruction that stores the link register.  The posted
> version works for me FWIW.

I found out that it didn't fail with the space on x86 (hence false negative) 
because of the TI marker added by some RTL pass.  Feel free to adjust back.
 
-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to