On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:40:51AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > The patch doesn't make much sense to me. I think the problem is that > NAMELIST_DECL is output in a ref section (LTO_namelist_decl_ref) but > the output routine writes other refs (via stream_write_tree and > outputting the constructor). lto_output_tree_ref may not do this > kind of stuff. Instead the contents of a NAMELIST_DECL need to be > output from the generic tree writing routines. > > Where are NAMELIST_DECLs possibly refered from?
I think usually from BLOCK_VARS of some BLOCK. Jakub