On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:40:51AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> The patch doesn't make much sense to me. I think the problem is that
> NAMELIST_DECL is output in a ref section (LTO_namelist_decl_ref) but
> the output routine writes other refs (via stream_write_tree and
> outputting the constructor). lto_output_tree_ref may not do this
> kind of stuff. Instead the contents of a NAMELIST_DECL need to be
> output from the generic tree writing routines.
>
> Where are NAMELIST_DECLs possibly refered from?
I think usually from BLOCK_VARS of some BLOCK.
Jakub
