Richard wrote:
I think you can't rely on pointer equivalence of the lookup_attribute
result so you want instead of

Thanks, makes sense.

Please also name CIF_OPTION_MISMATCH as CIF_ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH
and say "function attribute mismatch" in the description.

Done.

What about updated patch?

-Y
	PR sanitizer/59600

gcc/ChangeLog:

2014-01-21  ygribov  <ygri...@samsung.com>

	* cif-code.def (ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH): New CIF code.
	* ipa-inline.c (report_inline_failed_reason): Handle mismatched
	sanitization attributes.
	(sanitize_attrs_match_for_inline_p): New function.
	(can_inline_edge_p): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2014-01-21  ygribov  <ygri...@samsung.com>

	* gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c: : New test.

diff --git a/gcc/cif-code.def b/gcc/cif-code.def
index 5591f9a..71f3e39 100644
--- a/gcc/cif-code.def
+++ b/gcc/cif-code.def
@@ -123,3 +123,7 @@ DEFCIFCODE(OPTIMIZATION_MISMATCH, CIF_FINAL_ERROR,
 /* We can't inline because the callee refers to comdat-local symbols.  */
 DEFCIFCODE(USES_COMDAT_LOCAL, CIF_FINAL_NORMAL,
 	   N_("callee refers to comdat-local symbols"))
+
+/* We can't inline because of mismatched caller/callee attributes.  */
+DEFCIFCODE(ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH, CIF_FINAL_NORMAL,
+	   N_("function attribute mismatch"))
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-inline.c b/gcc/ipa-inline.c
index 5f47e0b..ce24ea5 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-inline.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-inline.c
@@ -234,7 +234,25 @@ report_inline_failed_reason (struct cgraph_edge *e)
     }
 }
 
-/* Decide if we can inline the edge and possibly update
+ /* Decide whether sanitizer-related attributes allow inlining. */
+
+static bool
+sanitize_attrs_match_for_inline_p (const_tree caller, const_tree callee)
+{
+  /* Don't care if sanitizer is disabled */
+  if (!(flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_ADDRESS))
+    return true;
+
+  if (!caller || !callee)
+    return true;
+
+  return !!lookup_attribute ("no_sanitize_address",
+      DECL_ATTRIBUTES (caller)) == 
+      !!lookup_attribute ("no_sanitize_address",
+      DECL_ATTRIBUTES (callee));
+}
+
+ /* Decide if we can inline the edge and possibly update
    inline_failed reason.  
    We check whether inlining is possible at all and whether
    caller growth limits allow doing so.  
@@ -327,6 +345,12 @@ can_inline_edge_p (struct cgraph_edge *e, bool report,
       e->inline_failed = CIF_TARGET_OPTION_MISMATCH;
       inlinable = false;
     }
+  /* Don't inline a function with mismatched sanitization attributes. */
+  else if (!sanitize_attrs_match_for_inline_p (e->caller->decl, callee->decl))
+    {
+      e->inline_failed = CIF_ATTRIBUTE_MISMATCH;
+      inlinable = false;
+    }
   /* Check if caller growth allows the inlining.  */
   else if (!DECL_DISREGARD_INLINE_LIMITS (callee->decl)
 	   && !disregard_limits
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c
index e69de29..5853801 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/nosanitize-and-inline.c
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+/* This is a simplified version of what Emacs does internally,
+   when marking its stack.  */
+
+static unsigned long sum;
+static void *stack_base;
+
+/* A simple substitute for what Emacs actually does.  */
+static void
+mark_maybe_pointer (void *p)
+{
+  sum ^= (unsigned long) p;
+}
+
+static inline void __attribute__ ((no_sanitize_address))
+mark_memory (void **start, void **end)
+{
+  void **pp;
+
+  if (end < start)
+    {
+      void **tem = start;
+      start = end;
+      end = tem;
+    }
+
+  for (pp = start; pp < end; pp++)
+    {
+      /* This is the dereference that we don't want sanitized.  */
+      void *p = *pp;
+
+      mark_maybe_pointer (p);
+    }
+}
+
+static void
+mark_stack (void)
+{
+  void *end;
+  mark_memory (stack_base, &end);
+}
+
+void
+garbage_collect (void)
+{
+  mark_stack ();
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  void *dummy;
+  stack_base = &dummy;
+  garbage_collect ();
+  return 0;
+}

Reply via email to