Hi! On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:32:35 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov <i.usma...@samsung.com> wrote: > This patch is pretty obvious. Currently ASYNC clause cannot have > integer-expression-list. Patch fixes this. > > OK for gomp4 branch?
> From df76a29ebf869687209d7a606e243624cc136dbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ilmir Usmanov <i.usma...@samsung.com> > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:04:47 +0400 > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Fix ASYNC > > --- > gcc/gimplify.c | 4 ++-- > gcc/omp-low.c | 4 ++-- > gcc/tree-core.h | 6 +++--- > gcc/tree.c | 6 +++--- > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Sure, with ChangeLog added, and the following changes folded in, I think: > --- a/gcc/gimplify.c > +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c > @@ -6545,11 +6545,11 @@ gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses (tree *list_p) > case OMP_CLAUSE_OACC_DEVICE: > case OMP_CLAUSE_DEVICE_RESIDENT: > case OMP_CLAUSE_USE_DEVICE: > + case OMP_CLAUSE_ASYNC: > case OMP_CLAUSE_GANG: > case OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT: GANG/ASYNC/WAIT, for consistency? > --- a/gcc/tree.c > +++ b/gcc/tree.c > @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ unsigned const char omp_clause_num_ops[] = > 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_OACC_DEVICE */ > 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_DEVICE_RESIDENT */ > 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_USE_DEVICE */ > + 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_ASYNC */ > 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_GANG */ > 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT */ Likewise. For consistency, also move OMP_CLAUSE_ASYNC_EXPR in gcc/tree.h, and also adapt OMP_CLAUSE_ASYNC in gcc/tree-pretty-print.c:dump_omp_clause? Grüße, Thomas
pgpQJ0AeLLvJc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
