On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:33:18PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:14:51PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > >> I'll post update-copyright.py separately. > > Thanks for doing this, looks good to me FWIW. I don't know whether > we want to keep a single script for both GCC and binutils+gdb or fork, > but probably separate copies makes sense.
I guess we have 8 months to decide what to do with my hacks. :-) If you choose to merge my changes that's fine by me too. > As far as including include/ goes: the only reason that didn't happen > for gcc/ was because I didn't want to sort out which files were GCC- > specific and whether binutils, GCC or GDB was the master for each file. > So if we do your option (b) I think we should do (c) as well. I suppose > that means syncing GCC's include/ with binutils+gdb and then adding > GCC's include/ to the list of "approved" directories. I'm happy to try > that if it sounds OK. (Maybe after the 4.9 release, not sure.) I'm happy with (c, but for now have committed just the other changes. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM