On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, Tobias Burnus wrote: > the attached patch mentions the support of Cilk Plus in GCC 4.9 in the > release notes, http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html > > Is the patch OK?
"Plus is an extension...", should this read "Cilk Plus is an extension?" If so, I suggest to switch the second and third sentences: first explain what it is, then go into specifics such as ABI. Looks good to me otherwise (modulo the ABI question I cannot answer :-). Gerald
