> -----Original Message----- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:a...@firstfloor.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:38 PM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: Andi Kleen; Tobias Burnus; Gerald Pfeifer; gcc-patches; Jakub Jelinek > Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes > > > _Cilk_spawn is the correct keyword. "cilk_spawn" can be used if the > > user includes <cilk/cilk.h> which has the following 3 lines (and > > that's the whole file) > > > > #define cilk_spawn _Cilk_spawn > > #define cilk_sync _Cilk_sync > > #define cilk_for _Cilk_for > > > > > > In Cilk there are basically 3 keywords: _Cilk_spawn, _Cilk_sync and > _Cilk_for. _Cilk_for patch is still under review but _Cilk_spawn and > _Cilk_sync keywords are supported. > > Thanks for explaining. But that should be somewhere in the documentation. > I think you could just put that paragraph in there. > > How about all the pragmas, or do these only only exist on icc?
They should be supported. > How about special functions? Yes. > > Basically should have a list of what cilkplus means here. > Everything except _Cilk_for should be supported. > -Andi > > -- > a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
