On 16 March 2014 16:09, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: > OK, thinking further on it I actually agree with not mentioning DRs on a > partially baked standard. We advertise that support for new standards is > experimental.
I don't think it does any harm to add comments during the C++1y/C++1z process to note that we've incorporated a particular DR against an earlier working paper, because it's not always obvious which draft our work-in-progress follows, but once the standard is finished I'd be in favour of removing those comments. Implementing those DRs is implied by implementing the finished standard.
