Hi, On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > recently I've been looking into a number of bugs involving > > > symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes in one way or another and I have > > > always started by applying the hunk below. I did this because > > > distinguishing different symbol nodes only according to their names is > > > just so inconvenient, especially when compiling C++. The risk is > > > minimal and therefore I'd like to propose it to trunk even at this > > > late stage, although I can of course wait until the next stage1. > > > > > > The other hunk is something that I think is also useful when looking > > > into all failures of ipcp_verify_propagated_values like e.g. PR 60727. > > > > > > I included the patch in a recent bootstrap and testing and it of > > > course passes. OK for trunk now? Or later? > > > > I'll leave the actual changes for review by Honza, it's fine at this > > stage if he things the changes make sense and are consistent. > > It seems fine to me...
Thanks, I will commit it shortly then. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard. > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > 2014-04-01 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> > > > > > > * ipa-cp.c (ipcp_verify_propagated_values): Also dump symtab and > > > mention gcc_unreachable before failing. > > > * ipa.c (symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes): Also print order of > > > removed symbols. > > > > > > Index: src/gcc/ipa-cp.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- src.orig/gcc/ipa-cp.c > > > +++ src/gcc/ipa-cp.c > > > @@ -884,8 +884,9 @@ ipcp_verify_propagated_values (void) > > > { > > > if (dump_file) > > > { > > > + dump_symtab (dump_file); > > > fprintf (dump_file, "\nIPA lattices after constant " > > > - "propagation:\n"); > > > + "propagation, before gcc_unreachable:\n"); > > This means before symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes? No, there is litrally a call to gcc_unreachable just below this dumping. I added this to grep for it easily when I have a number of dumps lying around because there is the same string in normal dumps too. Thanks, Martin