On 16 April 2014 13:38, Zoran Jovanovic <zoran.jovano...@imgtec.com> wrote: > Hello, > This is new patch version.
The comment from the previous iteration still holds true: > +@item -fbitfield-merge you are talking about '-fmerge-bitfields' up until here. Please fix all occurances of "bitfield-merge", both in the docs as well as in the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bitfldmrg2.c testcase -- how did that pass anyway as that option is presumably not recognized? :) thanks,
