On Apr 22, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> writes: >> Ping. >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00769.html >> Any ideas? I recall chatter on IRC that we want to merge wide-int into trunk >> soon. Bootstrap failure on arm would prevent that... > > Sorry for the late reply. I hadn't forgotten, but I wanted to wait > until I had chance to look into the ICE before replying, which I haven't > had chance to do yet.
They are separable issues, so, I checked in the change. > It's a shame we can't use C++ style casts, > but I suppose that's the price to pay for being able to write > "unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT”. unsigned_HOST_WIDE_INT isn’t horrible, but, yeah, my fingers were expecting a typedef or better. I slightly prefer the int (1) style, but I think we should go the direction of the patch.
