On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 14:23 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:17:32PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Ping2. Please let me know if I should ping/cc other people to get this
> > reviewed.
>
> Do you want to add DW_AT_type to DW_TAG_enumeration only if it has explicit
> underlying type (enum class foo: char { ... };) or even when the underlying
> type is computed emplicitly (then you'd just use TREE_TYPE of the
> ENUMERAL_TYPE if non-NULL).
The debugger cares about the actual underlying type used if the language
can use multiple. Either explicitly assigned by the user or implicitly
as derived by the language/compile flags used. So the lang hook should
provide one in both cases, if appropriate.
Cheers,
Mark
