On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
<lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This hunk in your patch doesn't seem related:
Oops, Sorry. Removed that, and re-tested.
>
> @@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ Warn about missing fields in struct init
> Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess
> C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_sizeof_pointer_memaccess) Warning
> LangEnabledBy(C ObjC C++ ObjC++,Wall)
>
> +Wsizeof-array-argument
> +C Var(warn_sizeof_array_argument) Warning LangEnabledBy(C,Wall)
> +
> Wsuggest-attribute=format
> C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_suggest_attribute_format) Warning
> Warn about functions which might be candidates for format attributes
>
> Also, it would be good to update doc/invoke.texi, the current
> description is a bit confusing. It says it is enabled by default when
> it actually isn't (nor after your patch). I propose something like:
>
>
> Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 208669)
> +++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
> @@ -4997,9 +4997,10 @@
> @item -Wvariadic-macros
> @opindex Wvariadic-macros
> @opindex Wno-variadic-macros
> -Warn if variadic macros are used in pedantic ISO C90 mode, or the GNU
> -alternate syntax when in pedantic ISO C99 mode. This is default.
> -To inhibit the warning messages, use @option{-Wno-variadic-macros}.
> +Warn if variadic macros are used in ISO C90 mode, or if the GNU
> +alternate syntax is used in ISO C99 mode. This is enabled by either
> +@option{-Wpedantic} or @option{-Wtraditional}. To inhibit the warning
> +messages, use @option{-Wno-variadic-macros}.
>
> @item -Wvarargs
> @opindex Wvarargs
Thanks. I added this to the patch.
>
> On 29 April 2014 14:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
Is this version OK ?
[libcpp]
* macro.c (parse_params): Remove check for Wpedantic for variadic macros.
[gcc/c-family]
* c.opt (-Wvariadic-macros): Init(-1) instead of Init(1).
* c-opts.c (c_common_handle_option): Add case OPT_Wvariadic_macros.
(sanitize_cpp_opts): Check condition for pedantic or
warn_traditional.
[gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp]
* Wvariadic-5.c: New test-case.
[gcc/doc]
* invoke.text: Change documentation for Wvariadic-macros option.
Thanks and Regards,
Prathamesh
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
>> <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 23 April 2014 20:03, Prathamesh Kulkarni <bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I didn't attach the patch, I am extremely sorry for the noise.
>>>> I am re-posting the mail.
>>>> This is a follow up mail to
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2014-04/msg00096.html
>>>> I have attached patch that prints the warning when passed -Wvariadic-macros
>>>> (I mostly followed it along lines of -Wlong-long).
>>>> OK for trunk ?
>>>
>>> Hi Prathamesh,
>>>
>>> Thanks for CCing me! I cannot approve patches, but it looks almost
>>> perfect to me. Did you run the regression testsuite and compare the
>>> results before/after your patch? I would expect at least one testcase
>>> testing this warning that would be affected by the change. If not, it
>>> would be nice to add testcases for this. Also, there is another place
>>> that tests for both Wpedantic and Wvariadic-macros just above the one
>>> that you modify. I think you should update all of them to just test
>>> for Wvariadic-macros.
>>>
>>> Once you do that, I hope Joseph will approve it quickly, it seems an
>>> obvious fix to me for consistency with Wlong-long and to allow people
>>> to use this warning without enabling Wpedantic (also, it will enable
>>> the warning with Wtraditional as intended, which is currently broken).
>>>
>> Thanks, I modified the patch to remove Wpedantic check and added a new
>> test-case.
>> For changes to libcpp, do I need to run the entire test-suite or only runinng
>> libcpp tests (RUNTESTFLAGS=cpp.exp) is fine ?
>> I ran libcpp tests, and there appeared to be no failures.
>>
>> [libcpp]
>> * macro.c (parse_params): Remove check for Wpedantic for variadic macros.
>>
>> [gcc/c-family]
>> * c.opt (-Wvariadic-macros): Init(-1) instead of Init(1).
>> * c-opts.c (c_common_handle_option): Add case OPT_Wvariadic_macros.
>> (sanitize_cpp_opts): Check condition for pedantic or
>> warn_traditional.
>>
>> [gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp]
>> * Wvariadic-5.c: New test-case.
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Prathamesh
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Manuel.
Index: libcpp/macro.c
===================================================================
--- libcpp/macro.c (revision 209800)
+++ libcpp/macro.c (working copy)
@@ -2794,14 +2794,12 @@ parse_params (cpp_reader *pfile, cpp_mac
pfile->spec_nodes.n__VA_ARGS__);
pfile->state.va_args_ok = 1;
if (! CPP_OPTION (pfile, c99)
- && CPP_OPTION (pfile, cpp_pedantic)
&& CPP_OPTION (pfile, warn_variadic_macros))
cpp_pedwarning
(pfile, CPP_W_VARIADIC_MACROS,
"anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99");
}
- else if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, cpp_pedantic)
- && CPP_OPTION (pfile, warn_variadic_macros))
+ else if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, warn_variadic_macros))
cpp_pedwarning (pfile, CPP_W_VARIADIC_MACROS,
"ISO C does not permit named variadic macros");
Index: gcc/c-family/c-opts.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c-opts.c (revision 209800)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-opts.c (working copy)
@@ -396,6 +396,10 @@ c_common_handle_option (size_t scode, co
cpp_opts->cpp_warn_long_long = value;
break;
+ case OPT_Wvariadic_macros:
+ cpp_opts->warn_variadic_macros = value;
+ break;
+
case OPT_Wmissing_include_dirs:
cpp_opts->warn_missing_include_dirs = value;
break;
@@ -1227,8 +1231,9 @@ sanitize_cpp_opts (void)
/* Similarly with -Wno-variadic-macros. No check for c99 here, since
this also turns off warnings about GCCs extension. */
- cpp_opts->warn_variadic_macros
- = cpp_warn_variadic_macros && (pedantic || warn_traditional);
+ if (cpp_warn_variadic_macros == -1)
+ cpp_warn_variadic_macros = pedantic || warn_traditional;
+ cpp_opts->warn_variadic_macros = cpp_warn_variadic_macros;
/* If we're generating preprocessor output, emit current directory
if explicitly requested or if debugging information is enabled.
Index: gcc/c-family/c.opt
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-family/c.opt (revision 209800)
+++ gcc/c-family/c.opt (working copy)
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(warn_unused_result
Warn if a caller of a function, marked with attribute warn_unused_result, does not use its return value
Wvariadic-macros
-C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(cpp_warn_variadic_macros) Init(1) Warning
+C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Var(cpp_warn_variadic_macros) Init(-1) Warning
Warn about using variadic macros
Wvarargs
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi (revision 209800)
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -4997,9 +4997,10 @@ modes. To inhibit the warning messages,
@item -Wvariadic-macros
@opindex Wvariadic-macros
@opindex Wno-variadic-macros
-Warn if variadic macros are used in pedantic ISO C90 mode, or the GNU
-alternate syntax when in pedantic ISO C99 mode. This is default.
-To inhibit the warning messages, use @option{-Wno-variadic-macros}.
+Warn if variadic macros are used in ISO C90 mode, or if the GNU
+alternate syntax is used in ISO C99 mode. This is enabled by either
+@option{-Wpedantic} or @option{-Wtraditional}. To inhibit the warning
+messages, use @option{-Wno-variadic-macros}.
@item -Wvarargs
@opindex Wvarargs
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/Wvariadic-5.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/Wvariadic-5.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/Wvariadic-5.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990 -Wvariadic-macros" } */
+
+#define f(x,...) /* { dg-warning "variadic" } */
+#define g(x,y...) /* { dg-warning "variadic" } */
+int not_empty;
