On 02/03/2014 10:05 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/17/2014 11:26 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/08/2014 03:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
What about the attached version? It still does not exactly match your
original suggestion because gimple_call_lhs (stmt) can be NULL_TREE if
the result is ignored and this case needs instrumentation, as you
explained, so I use the function return type in the aggregate_value_p
check.
Testing is still under way, but looks good so far. I'm bootstrapping
with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fstack-protector-strong" with Ada enabled, for
additional coverage.
Testing passed without new regressions. Is this okay for trunk?
Ping? Thanks.
Now that 4.9 is released, I'd like to propose again this fix for inclusion:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00374.html>
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
