On May 6, 2014 9:15:09 PM CEST, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >On 05/06/14 12:58, David Malcolm wrote: >>> But the prefix can be as short as e.g. "g" (for gimple), so gtry, >ggoto, >>> gassign, gcall. >> >> FWIW, I like this: I think it's clear and concise, and I think it >avoids >> the need for namespaces. (I'd prefer not to have a namespace, due to >> gengtype). >Then let's go with it. g<foo> is as reasonable as anything else we're >likely to come up with.
Agreed. Richard. >jeff
