On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:45 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in >>>> any of the bits. >>> >>> >>> I thought it would be useful to have approved codes in the trunk to >>> reveal some possible problems on earlier stages. It also requires >>> significant effort to keep everything in consistency with the trunk >>> (especially when big refactoring happens) and having some parts >>> committed would be helpful. Will keep it in a branch for now but let >>> me know if you change your mind :) >> >> I understand -- my preference would to be go go ahead with the stuff that's >> already been approved, mostly for the reasons noted above. But with Richi >> wanting to see it go in as a whole after complete review I think it's best >> to wait. While we could argue back and forth with Richi, it's not a good >> use of time. >> > > Shouldn't there a git or svn branch for MPX, including run-time library, > so that people can take a look at the complete MPX change and try > MPX today as NOP? The only extra requirement is MPX enabled > binutils.
That would indeed be useful. Richard. > > -- > H.J.