Hi Wei,
please teach your mailer not to break/mangle long lines. Thanks.
> Here is a patch for the test. It contains two changes:
> 1. For emutls, there will be an explicit call generated at expand
> pass, and no stack adjustment is needed. So add /* {
> dg-require-effective-target tls_native } */ in the test.
> 2. Replace cfi_def_cfa_offset with insn sequence check.
>
> Is it ok?
No, the test FAILs for 32-bit i386-pc-solaris2.11 with Sun as/ld:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr58066.c scan-assembler
sub[^\r\n]*8[^\r\n]*sp.*call[^\r\n]*__tls_get_addr.*sub[^\r\n]*8[^\r\n]*sp.*call[^\r\n]*__tls_get_addr
The TLS code sequence is different here:
subl $8, %esp
leal ccc1@tlsgd(,%ebx,1), %eax
call ccc1@tlsgdplt
I fear this insn scanning is going to be extremely fragile.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
