On 05/12/14 05:00, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Richard Sandiford wrote:
@@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ struct GTY((chain_next ("RTX_NEXT (&%h)"
/* The INSN_UID of an RTX_INSN-class code. */
int insn_uid;
+ /* The SYMBOL_REF_FLAGS of a SYMBOL_REF. */
+ unsigned int symbol_ref_flags;
+
In [3/7] you used
+ /* The ORIGINAL_REGNO of a REG. */
+ unsigned original_regno;
+
Should be consistent.
Oops, indeed. Will fix them all to use unsigned int if approved.
Approved with the consistency fix.
jeff
