The test is on general changes. However I was able to test it on x86 only.
I see 2 possible solutions:
1. Set the test for x86 only.
2. Modify it so that it will pass on sparc-sun-solaris2.
If 2. is not acceptable I'll create patch for 1.
Currently I don't see why "in0_9 = *in_27" is not supported. Does the
test fail because of unsupported permutation?
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Rainer Orth
<r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Patch with fixes attached.
>> Currently if-structure is as following:
>> + if (count == 3)
>> ...
>> + else
>> + {
>> + /* If length is not equal to 3 then only power of 2 is supported.
>> */
>> + gcc_assert (exact_log2 (count) != -1);
>>
>> For stores group I've created another mail thread.
> [...]
>>>> 2014-05-06 Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> PR tree-optimization/52252
>>>> * gcc.dg/vect/pr52252-ld.c: Test on loads group of size 3.
>
> This test FAILs on sparc-sun-solaris2.11, both 32 and 64-bit:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr52252-ld.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops"
> 1
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr52252-ld.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times
> vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
>
> The dumps have
>
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr52252-ld.c:10:3:
> note: not vectorized: relevant stmt not supported: in0_9 = *in_27;
> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr52252-ld.c:7:1: note:
> vectorized 0 loops in function.
>
> Rainer
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
