Hello!
Attached patch fixes:
md.texi:1057: warning: node next `Constraints' in menu `Asm Labels'
and in sectioning `Size of an asm' differ
extend.texi:7175: warning: node `Asm Labels' is next for `Size of an
asm' in sectioning but not in menu
extend.texi:7175: warning: node prev `Size of an asm' in menu
`Explicit Reg Vars' and in sectioning `Constraints' differ
extend.texi:7197: warning: node prev `Asm Labels' in menu
`Constraints' and in sectioning `Size of an asm' differ
extend.texi:7245: warning: node `Size of an asm' is next for `Explicit
Reg Vars' in menu but not in sectioning
as seen when compiling on Fedora 20.
2014-05-17 Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
* doc/extend.texi (Size of an asm): Move node text according
to its @menu entry position.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index: doc/extend.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/extend.texi (revision 210549)
+++ doc/extend.texi (working copy)
@@ -7172,28 +7172,6 @@
@include md.texi
@raisesections
-@node Size of an asm
-@subsection Size of an @code{asm}
-
-Some targets require that GCC track the size of each instruction used
-in order to generate correct code. Because the final length of the
-code produced by an @code{asm} statement is only known by the
-assembler, GCC must make an estimate as to how big it will be. It
-does this by counting the number of instructions in the pattern of the
-@code{asm} and multiplying that by the length of the longest
-instruction supported by that processor. (When working out the number
-of instructions, it assumes that any occurrence of a newline or of
-whatever statement separator character is supported by the assembler --
-typically @samp{;} --- indicates the end of an instruction.)
-
-Normally, GCC's estimate is adequate to ensure that correct
-code is generated, but it is possible to confuse the compiler if you use
-pseudo instructions or assembler macros that expand into multiple real
-instructions, or if you use assembler directives that expand to more
-space in the object file than is needed for a single instruction.
-If this happens then the assembler may produce a diagnostic saying that
-a label is unreachable.
-
@node Asm Labels
@subsection Controlling Names Used in Assembler Code
@cindex assembler names for identifiers
@@ -7277,6 +7255,28 @@
specified for that operand in the @code{asm}.)
@end itemize
+@node Size of an asm
+@subsection Size of an @code{asm}
+
+Some targets require that GCC track the size of each instruction used
+in order to generate correct code. Because the final length of the
+code produced by an @code{asm} statement is only known by the
+assembler, GCC must make an estimate as to how big it will be. It
+does this by counting the number of instructions in the pattern of the
+@code{asm} and multiplying that by the length of the longest
+instruction supported by that processor. (When working out the number
+of instructions, it assumes that any occurrence of a newline or of
+whatever statement separator character is supported by the assembler --
+typically @samp{;} --- indicates the end of an instruction.)
+
+Normally, GCC's estimate is adequate to ensure that correct
+code is generated, but it is possible to confuse the compiler if you use
+pseudo instructions or assembler macros that expand into multiple real
+instructions, or if you use assembler directives that expand to more
+space in the object file than is needed for a single instruction.
+If this happens then the assembler may produce a diagnostic saying that
+a label is unreachable.
+
@menu
* Global Reg Vars::
* Local Reg Vars::
