I didn't see an obvious fix (I'm not sure if the templated constructor can deduce its argument since the change) but have been out all day and not had a chance to look into it.
On 27 June 2014 08:27, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 06/27/2014 12:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On 26/06/14 23:21 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm afraid something went badly wrong with this commit, I'm seeing tens >>> of fails. See eg: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg02439.html >> >> >> It seems that uneq_allocator is no longer copy constructible. > > Can you spot a quick fix, like a thinko, or do you think Francois has to > look into it? I'm inclined to revert it for now, the noise is quite > annoying... > > Thanks, > Paolo.
