On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 08:55:57 -0700, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com 
> <augustine.sterl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> > > This is the xtensa fallout, see 
>> > > http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=272418
>> > >
>> > > g++ -c   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC  -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE  -fno-exceptions 
>> > > -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing 
>> > > -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute 
>> > > -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros 
>> > > -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. 
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/. 
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../include 
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include  
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber 
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber 
>> > > -I/home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace    -o insn-preds.o -MT 
>> > > insn-preds.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/insn-preds.TPo insn-preds.c
>> > > /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/config/xtensa/predicates.md: In function ‘int 
>> > > call_insn_operand_1(rtx, machine_mode)’:
>> > > /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/config/xtensa/predicates.md:113:57: error: 
>> > > cannot convert ‘const char*’ to ‘tree’ in assignment
>> > > /home/jbglaw/repos/gcc/gcc/config/xtensa/predicates.md:119:46: error: 
>> > > cannot convert ‘const char*’ to ‘tree’ in assignment
>> > > make[1]: *** [insn-preds.o] Error 1
>> > Should be fixed by this (and I see in my prevoius mail I wanted 
>> > TREE_STRING_POINTER)
>>
>> [resend due to gmail's stupid html-by-default]
>>
>> This patch looks correct to me, but I haven't watched quite enough of
>> the underlying change to know that replacing the strcmp with pointer
>> equality is really the right thing.
>>
>> If it is, approved for Xtensa.
>
> *ping*
>
> As Jan wrote it, I *guess* it probably is (haven't checked.)

Approved.

Reply via email to