On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:52:23PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > Comments, objections? Ok to apply the preliminary patch?
>
> Yes, what if you don't move the tests but just change how the .exp to
> use the same infrastructure as gcc.dg/torture instead?
Yeah. I believe gcc.c-torture/compile/ has been converted already,
so it is just about gcc.c-torture/execute/. Each of these tests has
it's own default idioms, e.g. -w in by default in gcc.c-torture/.
So, please just tweak execute.exp, so that it does what it did until now
(perhaps with the exception of *.x files support) in dg framework, and
convert *.exp files into dg-* directives in the testcases.
Jakub
