Hi Cesar! On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:44:13 -0700, Cesar Philippidis <ce...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 07/24/2014 06:11 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > I'd suggest to continue to handle all the data clauses [...] > > I moved all of the data clause matching back to gfc_match_omp_clauses, > and I guarded the copyin clause with the openacc flag.
Thanks!
> It looks like the
> private clause may also require a special memory mapping, so I left the
> openacc flag in place.
Where is that? (I don't see it.)
> Is this patch OK to commit to gomp-4_0-branch?
Yes, though you may directly fold in the following patch to nuke the
unused OMP_LIST_COPY (or do that later).
--- gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
+++ gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c
@@ -1257,7 +1257,6 @@ show_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses *omp_clauses)
const char *type = NULL;
switch (list_type)
{
- case OMP_LIST_COPY: type = "COPY"; break;
case OMP_LIST_DEVICEPTR: type = "DEVICEPTR"; break;
case OMP_LIST_USE_DEVICE: type = "USE_DEVICE"; break;
case OMP_LIST_DEVICE_RESIDENT: type = "USE_DEVICE"; break;
--- gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
+++ gcc/fortran/gfortran.h
@@ -1157,9 +1157,8 @@ enum
OMP_LIST_TO,
OMP_LIST_FROM,
OMP_LIST_REDUCTION,
- OMP_LIST_COPY,
- OMP_LIST_DATA_CLAUSE_FIRST = OMP_LIST_COPY,
OMP_LIST_DEVICEPTR,
+ OMP_LIST_DATA_CLAUSE_FIRST = OMP_LIST_DEVICEPTR,
OMP_LIST_DATA_CLAUSE_LAST = OMP_LIST_DEVICEPTR,
OMP_LIST_DEVICE_RESIDENT,
OMP_LIST_USE_DEVICE,
Grüße,
Thomas
pgpp05bdfd2gj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
