> I would still add a test case which does not contain a reduction (+=) > and where graphite is not duplicating pbbs.
> Help for what? I was looking to create a simple test case. Is there still an > open bug? Sorry, I thought, we should add this test case to be able to test graphite without patch related to graphite-sese-to-poly.c (patch1). > Sorry Roman. I am still confused. Are we looking for a test case or are we > still trying to understand an issue. Specifically, do we still incorrectly > transform the code even after your isl_id_for_pbb() patch? I gives a wrong answer without patch1. The code is transformed correctly with this patch. -- Cheers, Roman Gareev.